A main drawback is the complexity of testing and troubleshooting, as well as the need for detailed GIS records to accommodate splitter placement. Training can also be challenging for those unfamiliar with this architecture. Centralized splits typically use higher fiber count cables than distributed split networks, increasing both material and splicing labor costs. Another disadvantage is the aesthetic impact of the PON. A GPON splitter is a passive optical device that takes a single fiber input and splits it into multiple outputs, typically in ratios like 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, and 1:64. The splitting process introduces signal attenuation, making placement strategy critical for network performance. PON, developed in the mid-1990s, was originally designed to allow internet service providers (ISPs) to deliver broadband triple-play services (data, voice, and video) to residential users. By dividing a single optical signal from a central Optical Line Terminal (OLT) into multiple outputs for Optical Network. Morgan said the downside is that there is “a little bit less ability to troubleshoot” because the terminals are not all in one place. “This is becoming more popular for.
